Bob's Byte

The Rise of "Others"

  • PDF

Can you name the top 5 makers of smartphones? Apple, Samsung...uh, well a few others come to mind.

One PlusSamsung remains the world’s biggest mobile manufacturer, but its market share slid 2.2% year-on-year by the end of 2015. They hold 22.5% market share while Apple fell 4.4% to a 15.9% share, according to Gartner.

Global sales of smartphones to end users totaled 403 million units in Q4 2015, a 9.7% increase over the same period in 2014. Yet this is the slowest growth rate since 2008. In all of 2015, smartphone sales reached 1.4 billion units, an increase of 14.4% from 2014.

In Q4 2015, Samsung and Huawei were the only two top-five smartphone vendors to increase their sales to end users. Apple suffered its first decline in sales of smartphones — iPhone sales were down 4.4 percent.


Chinese Company Buys Ingram Micro

  • PDF

Ingram Micro HQOut of the blue sea, Tianjin Tianhai from China announced it will buy Ingram-Micro, the world's largest technology distributor for $6 billion.

$6 billion for a $46 billion company tells you a lot about the business of high tech distribution. But this story is not about the HOW MUCH but more about the WHO and the WHY.

Tianjin Tianhai began as a humble marine shipping company and turned itself into a modern logistic industry investor and operator, focusing on investment in logistics, supply chain and management-- and financing service for the logistic industry.


The Saga of Cost-Breakdown on the iPhone

  • PDF

Tim Cook, CEO, Apple says, "... there are cost breakdowns that come out for our products that are much different than the reality. I've never seen one that is anywhere close to being accurate."

The Average Sales Price and the cost-to-produce of the latest iPhones is at heart of the newest debate.

iPhone price comparison

But first let's take a step back at look at why Wall Street is leading this debate...

Wall Street likes to compare itself to Bulls and Bears, animals of great stature. The animals represent those who are positive about stock prices (Bull) versus those who are pessimistic (Bears): so it's a zoological metaphor for positive and negative.

To outsiders those Wall Street mammals sure sound more like squirrels and skunks. While that may sound harsh, the animals may forgive us.

Squirrels are gregarious, the noisy cheer-leaders of nature. Busy up and down the tree all day, chattering away, gathering acorns for rainy days. They tend to leaps of faith while they make dramatic jumps from tree to tree. You can see them sometimes, fully stretched in a beautiful jump... and then the shock when they hit a slippery tree limb for a change... hanging by their front feet...backwards kicking out on thin air...their dignity momentarily gone... until they pull themselves up on the branch...looking around to make sure no one saw the gaff.

Some of them even think they can fly, but it is really a glide. You can't get more optimistic than a squirrel.

Squirrel_SkunkSkunks, on the other hand, are not party animals. Skunks are solitary, nocturnal. They are dormant for about a month during the coldest part of the winter. While some consider skunks as pests, they serve a useful purpose in backyard eating insects and reptiles.

You don't bother a skunk because it raises a stink.

If threatened, skunks will stamp their feet, raise their tails and arch their backs. When you are faced with this situation it is wise to retreat. With their patented white stripe down the black back, if it seems like the skunk’s stripes are pointing right to where their defensive spray comes out, that’s because it is. The skunk's strongest defense comes from its butt.

Now to the point: the Bulls/squirrels and Bears/skunks on Wall Street fight constantly over whether a stock is going up or down, on the value of holding stock in a particular company. They do this to drive a stock price up or down, depending upon whether they are a Bull or Bear in their stock holdings. A Bull would usually own stock and if the stock price rises, their portfolio increases in value.  A Bear might have "short" the stock (that is, placed a bet on the stock's drop) and that price drop enriches the Bear's wallet.

OK, don't ask me about "puts" and "calls." The important thing to know is that Apple, as the world's most valuable company, is a favorite issue of debate on Wall Street. And because there is money involved, stock analysts often have more resources (including access to top executives) than most journalists.  

Here is what Wall Street is now talking about: Apple recently reported profits of $11 billion for the quarter that ended in September 2015 on revenue of $51.5 billion. That's more than the combined profits of Google ($4.7 billion) and Microsoft ($5.8 billion). And the year's biggest profits are yet to come, after the holiday shopping season.

But while the squirrels are flying high, some skunks are giving the "SELL your shares NOW" sign on Apple.

Much of the debate for the future of Apple centers on the iPhone and the rise and fall of its sales margin. At any other company, Apple's other products (9.8 million iPads and 5.7 million Macs) would be considered successful products. But Apple is considered by Wall Street to be a one product company. Its value is driven by the iPhone.

The iPhone earned 62% of all Apple revenue last quarter. Apple sold 48 million iPhones in the quarter generating $32 billion in revenue (up from 39 million iPhones and $24 billion in revenue in the same quarter of 2014).

Apple has managed to raise the average price of the iPhones it sells ($670 asp, up $67 from 2014) because customers are opting for models with bigger screens or more storage space.

Teardowns suggest that the $670 iPhone may cost as little as $236 to make. And Apple says its overall gross margin — how much revenue is left after subtracting manufacturing costs for all Apple products — is 39.9% (compared with 38% a year ago and 37% two years ago).

So what's the debate between Wall Street squirrels and skunks regarding  Apple's cost-to-build?

Squirrels are arguing the margins are better because the phones cost Apple less. So Apple's margin guidance for the quarter of 39%-40% is perfectly realistic. They predict sales increases as much as 7% and improving margins. So BUY the stock.

Skunks argue that supply chain details (especially from numbers released by Foxconn about its own business) are a negative indicator. They say with component costs increasing from the prior year model, Apple will face some margin contraction. They also see a sales decrease and a recurring hardware cycle that puts pressure on the soon-to-be Apple 7. So SELL the stock, is their suggestion.

The whole issue rests on the cost-to-produce. Here is the latest attempt to factor in "software" to the "build cost" of an iPhone.

Alex Cho Cost breakdown

This is based on a statement on Apple's Form 10-K 2015...

"The Company has identified up to three deliverables regularly included in arrangements involving the sale of these devices. The first deliverable, which represents the substantial portion of the allocated sales price, is the hardware and software essential to the functionality of the hardware device delivered at the time of sale. The second deliverable is the embedded right included with qualifying devices to receive on a when-and-if-available basis, future unspecified software upgrades relating to the product's essential software. The third deliverable is the non-software services to be provided to qualifying devices. The Company allocates revenue between these deliverables using the relative selling price method."  

And this particular analyst says, "Apple doesn't recognize its revenue at the retail price point, but rather the wholesale price point. Digital Trends estimate this cost to be $68.90, but it's actually a little less than that when based on a percentile basis and handset distribution model from UBS. I figure the wholesale to retail markup averages around 7.51% on a consolidated basis."

Hence, the analyst figures he knows better than Tim Cook the real cost of an iPhone and figures Apple is taking a gross margin of 47.62%

Why would Tim Cook distort the truth? It is known that sometimes some companies prefer not to be seen as puts off the buyers. So Wall Street assumes there is a deliberate distortion.

But anyone working at a large company knows how cost allocation is a political issue, how the powers in the company juggle definitions and costs to gerrymander the numbers they want to show.

The squirrels and skunks aren't seeing the forest for the trees: Apple 7 may or may not be such a revolutionary product that Apple fans drop their phones and rush to the stores. But the iPhone user base are generally happy folks and will follow the Apple product line-- until someone else creates a better product, In this case, it will take a paradigm shift to blast Apple out of a Number One spot.

And that Number One spot will insure Apple takes a healthy margin. Neither squirrels nor skunks even mentioned the fact Apple in many cases is taking the distributor and retailer margins as well as the manufacturer margins (as Apple owns its own profitable chain of leading retail stores).

The only reason to sell your Apple stock is if you need to cash out because it will cost you in the long run. If that sounds like a squirrel, so be it.

If you stand around long enough saying that Apple has reached an end to its growth, someday you will probably be right. But not today. Today you are just a skunk.

Go Analysts Argue Over iPhone Break-down Costs

Go How Foxconn Reports Raise Apple Questions

Intel Launches Core M Brand

  • PDF

Intel launches the first commercially available “no-conflict” processor, Core M,  and sends it directly into the battle for mobility. More front-line Intel innovations will fully arm laptops as they fight tablets & smartphones to win over the world’s 600 million owners of 4-year old laptops who are on the brink of change.

Intel's Kirk Skaugen

Six hundred million ageing laptops make an awfully big sales target. Each of those consumers faces a decision very different than the one when they bought their laptop four years ago. And Intel dedicated its IFA press conference to its battle plan to win over those hundreds of millions whose collective decisions may decide the fate of the PC.

And it’s no accident that Intel chose IFA as the place to announce Core M, its first processor brand since five years, and the man gun of their battle plan. The 14nm Intel Core M processor package is 50% smaller and, at 4.5 watts, has 60% lower thermal power than the previous generation.

This lets OEMs design sleek, fanless systems less than 9 mm thin – thinner than an AAA battery. “Captain” Kirk, leader of the Intel pc enterprise, told his IFA audience the new Intel Core M processor delivers up to 2X the compute performance, up to 7X better graphics compared to a 4-year-old PC, and double the battery life of the average 4-year-old PC.

Skaugen showed the audience some of the range of Core M-enabled models from Big brands like Dell, Asus, HP, Acer and Lenovo. Intel pins its hopes on the 2-in-1 “tablet-when-you-need-it, laptop-when-you-want it” to win over the 600 million who consume and create content.

The “multi-year journey to re-invent the notebook” is just one battlefront that Intel is fighting on. Tablets is another. Even desktops are alive and well, insists Intel, suggesting that desktops are evolving down several paths (gaming, workstations, mini PCs, all-in-ones.)

To understand how mobility has left no PC untouched, the latest trend Intel is promoting is the desktop known as a “portable all-in-one.”

Skaugen sets three missions for Intel.

1 By the end of next year they plan for all their technology to embrace wireless.

2 They want to eliminate the need for passwords.

3 And they hope to bring more 3D (“natural user interface”) to the screen.

They will find little "conflict" in any of those goals.

The Future of Mobile, According to GSMA

  • PDF

The Director General of GSMA, Anne Bouverot, gave her keynote "From the Internet of Things to Personal Data: The Future of Mobile”  at the TM Forum Live.

GSMA Director General Anne Bouverot

The future outlined by her speech is the future according to mobile opeators as the GSMA unites nearly 800 of the world’s mobile operators from 220 countries.

What's on the operators' minds?

"Globally, we now have 7.1 billion mobile connections," says Bouverot. "...There are more mobile connections than subscribers, as individual subscribers can have multiple connections or devices –number of users is far lower and stands at about 3.6 billion unique subscribers, about half the world’s population." 

For operators that means the opportunity lies not only in expanding the services to the "half that haves," but also in finding and signing up the "half that have not."

Without much mathematical ability, you can assume that, given time, the mobile business can be much more than doubled or even tripled. And GSMA believes they know how to do it...